The structure of communication

The process of communication, in fact, lasts our whole life, because, as social beings, without communication, we could not organize at least some kind of activity. This phenomenon attracted attention, both philosophers of the ancient world, and modern psychologists. Until now, there is no single classification of the structure of the process of interpersonal and intergroup communication, but we will cover the most common species.

Communication was divided into a structure to enable analysis for each element, and to streamline them.

In the structure, functions and modes of communication, three different processes are distinguished:

In psychology, the specifics of these processes are viewed as a way of interaction between the individual and society, while sociology considers the use of communication in social activities.

In addition, sometimes researchers make three in the psychological structure of communication functions:

Of course, in the process of communication, all these functions are closely interrelated and separate them exclusively for analysis and the system of experimental research.

Levels of analysis of the structure of communication

Soviet psychologist Boris Lomov, in the last century, identified three basic levels of analysis of the structure of speech communication, which is still used in psychology:

The founder of social psychology B. Parygin considered the structure of communication as a relationship between two main aspects: meaningful (directly communication) and formal (interaction with content and form).

Another Soviet psychologist A. Bodalev distinguished three main components among the types and structures of communication:

Communication, as a process of transferring information and interference of subjects of communication, can also be characterized relative its autonomous components:

For such a separation of the structure of communication, it is necessary to pay attention to the role of the environment in which communication is realized: social situation, the presence or absence of extraneous personalities during communication, which may affect the process. So, for example, non-communicable people are lost in the presence of extraneous personalities, they can act impulsively and rashly.

In conclusion, it should be noted that the process of communication is complete with a harmonious combination of two closely interrelated factors: external (behavioral), manifested in communicative actions of communicators, as well as in the choice of behavior and internal (value features of the subject of communication), which is expressed through verbal and non-verbal signals.