Sucralose - harm or benefit?

Sucralose, first released in the US under the trademark "Splenda" is an artificial substitute for sugar . Actually, it is made of it, and therefore is not endowed with any aftertaste, aftertaste or other side effects of this kind. Today it is necessary to understand what is more in sucralose, benefit or harm.

The substance was discovered in 1976 by accident. One of the test chemists licked the material obtained in the course of repeated reactions and found that it was incredibly sweet. Since that moment, numerous trials and experiments have begun on experimental animals, which were injected with a solution of sucralose in a variety of ways and observed the result. In the same year the drug was patented, and already in 1991 it was allowed to be used first in Canada, then in the US, and later in other countries of the world.

This substance is produced by chlorination of sucrose, that is, the hydrogen atoms are replaced by chlorine atoms and get the substance several hundred times sweeter than sugar. The caloric content of sucralose is zero: it does not participate in metabolic processes and does not react with digestive enzymes. Most of the substance - 85% is excreted by the intestine, and 15% by the kidneys.

Does sucralose harm?

This question worries many people who care about their health, because everyone has already heard about the numerous side effects from the use of other sweeteners synthesized by chemical means. However, over the long years of using in the food industry any confirmed facts that sucralose is harmful to the body, it has not been published, in fact, as well as those that sucralose is good for.

The glycemic index of this substance is zero, and therefore, it can be taken to diabetics as a substitute for sugar, because it does not increase the level of glucose in the blood. Another advantage of the sweetener is that when it is consumed during the period of a general decrease in the calorie content of the diet, there are no episodes of hunger than "sin" other chemically synthesized substances. Today it is combined with a variety of supplements and is offered to the consumer as a drug for improving metabolism and lipid metabolism, reducing the level of "bad" cholesterol in the blood, increasing the digestibility of vitamins and minerals, etc. It is a question of sucralose with inulin, the benefit and harm of which continue to discuss the numerous users around the world.

One tablet corresponds to sweetness of one piece of sugar, which is very convenient for dispensing and receiving. In addition, the drug is relatively cheap and has a convenient form of tuba. Popularity is enjoyed by the elite with sucralose and other substitutes.

Is it worth it or not?

Of course, those who hoped to benefit from the use of sacralose benefit, disappointed, but because the absence of harm can already be considered a benefit. This is especially true of the category of citizens who, due to certain diseases, are forced to abandon the usual sugar and seek a replacement. To someone who does not need such a question is simpler. For losing weight for a couple of kilograms you can look for another way and other analogues of sugar - stevia, etc. After all, we are talking about our own health and everyone here is inclined to trust their intuition and knowledge. In addition, among the exclamations of trust, there are those who tirelessly repeat about the harm of the sweetener of sucralose, explaining this by the fact that too little time has passed from the receipt of the substance to the mass consumer and that the consequences from consumption will still have an effect.

Perhaps, the share of truth is present in the words of these pessimistic people. In any case, do not put your children's health at risk, and when used by adults, it is recommended that you monitor your health.